🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the apparent data breach could boost AI companies looking for material to develop their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Declared Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not think the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the leaked music would probably be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced material is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.